Final Stalking Protective Order and Judgment

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

Catherine Lynne Carter, DOB: 2/2/5/77
vs
Rory Grey Bowman, DOB: 10/6/65, aka Rain Grey Bowman

Case number 0603 03051
FINAL STALKING PROTECTIVE ORDER AND JUDGMENT

This matter came before court on 04/21/06 for hearing on issuance of a Final Stalking Protective Order and Judgment.

Petitioner appeared in person with attorney R. Callahan 88026.
Respondent appeared in person.

The Court finds For Final Judgement.

1. Respondent has engaged intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, in repeated and unwanted contact with the Petitioner or a member of the Petitioner’s immediate family or household.
2. Respondent knew or should have known that the repeated contact was unwanted
3. Petitioner was alarmed or coerced by this unwanted contact.
4. It is objectively reasonable for a person in Petitioner’s situation to have been alarmed or coerced by Respondent’s contact
5. Respondent’s repeated and unwanted contact caused the Petitioner reasonable apprehension regarding the Petitioner’s own personal safety or the safety of a member of his/her immediate family or household.
6. Respondent represents a credible threat to the physical safety of the person to be protected by this order.
7. Any unwanted contact that was purely communicative in nature was perceived by Petitioner as a credible threat of imminent serious personal violence or physical harm to Petitioner or a member of his/her family, and it was reasonable to believe that such threat was likely to be followed by unlawful acts.
8. It is therefore ordered that Respondent is required to stop any contact with the person protected by this order, and any attempt to make contact with the person protected by this order.

9. Contact includes, but is not limited to, the following:
A. Coming into the visual or physical presence of the other person;
B. Following the other person;
C. Waiting outside the home, property, place of work or school of the other person or a member of that person’s family or household;
D. Sending or making written or electronic communications in any form to the other person;
E. Speaking with the other person by any means;
F. Communicating with the other person by any means, including through a third person;
G. Committing a crime against the other person;
H. Communicating with a third person who has some relationship to the other person with the intent of affecting the third person’s relationship with the other person;
I. Communicating with business entities with the intent of affecting some right or interest of the other person;
J. Damaging the other person’s home, property, place of work, or school: or
K. Delivering directly or through a third person any object to the home, property, place of work or school of the other person.

10. SECURITY AMOUNT FOR VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER IS $50,000

A hearing on PERMANENT relief having been set for today after notice to the Respondent:

17. The court has ordered the terms of restraint detailed in paragraphs 8 and 9, above. This Order is a Final Judgment and is of unlimited duration unless modified by law or further order of the court.

18. Petitioner and Respondent was served in Court with a copy of this Order.

19. Respondent’s date of birth is October 6, 1965.

Dated this 21st day of April, 2006.

D. G. Todd, Circuit Court Judge Pro Tempore

Posted April 21st, 2006 in 2. Round Two. Tagged: , , , , , .

Comments are closed.